ASSAP logo Weird orbs
Bookmark and Share

Out of focus part of photo 'orbing'
Out of focus photo showing highlights 'orbing'

Out of focus images made with cameras don't just go fuzzy, they turn into myriad circles of confusion (as above) but generally we don't notice it. In the picture above, a badly focused tree is 'orbing' ie. it's highlights are showing up as orbs. There were no physical circular shapes on the tree itself.

Note how the circles of confusion (effectively orbs) do NOT reflect the colour of the tree. They appear whitish compared to the green leaves and brown branches of the tree. That's because they derive their colour from white pinpoint highlights in the picture, rather than the general object colours. This is explained below ('orbs are not the colour of dust'). See also the picture bottom left. This shows a white orb derived from the highlight of a strongly blue coloured object.

Anomalous photo pages...
Orb FAQ - start here for orbs
What are anomalous photos?
Orbs and light trails
Vortexes and mists
Reflections, simulacra, shadows
Manipulation and more orbs
Taking anomalous photos
Odd shaped and coloured orbs
Orbs behind objects and zone
Take great orb photos
Orbs that aren't dust
Orbs: alternative explanations
Orbs with tails
Ghosts and extras in photos
Flare and weird glowing shapes
A weird photo and mirages

Orbs are not dust shaped

Orbs are circles of confusion (out of focus points of light) produced by point-shaped highlights on dust particles. Since they do not reflect the whole particle, there is no reason why they should be dust particle shaped.

Single objects in a photograph will typically produce many circles of confusion (see photo top left). However, a grain of dust is very small and will generally only produce one highlight and hence one circle or confusion. See here!

Orbs are not dust coloured

If orbs are just reflections from dust particles (or pollen), shouldn't they be the colour of the dust particles that produced them? The short answer is no. That's because orbs are circles of confusion based on the highlights of objects, not a reflection of the object as a whole.

Objects get their colour because they absorb certain wavelengths of light. The wavelengths reflected produce the object's characteristic colour. However, a highlight (eg. an edge) is a tiny bit where the light is reflected completely which is why it is brighter and generally white. So orbs are always basically white (see photo below) except where there is chromatic aberration or refraction involved (see above) or a coloured light source. Blue object producing white orb
Here you see an obviously blue rectangular object producing a pure white orb from a highlight (see article above). With a much smaller object, like a piece of dust or pollen grain, only the main highlight (which produces the orb) would be visible (ie. producing a single white orb). Thus a brilliant blue piece of dust would still produce a pure white orb. Note that in the picture here the orb is circular and white which does not reflect either the shape or colour of the intensely blue object.

   

Orbs with bits missing

Sometimes orbs can appear that seem to have bits missing. There are 'bites' missing out of their sides or holes in the middle, like a doughnut.

Orbs with bits missing

In the photo above you can see examples of both of these sort of orb. So what's going on here?

If you look carefully (unfortunately it's not a great picture) you will see that there are many faint overlapping orbs. The orbs are all different sizes and brightness because the objects causing them are at different distances from the camera. The resulting orbs overlap, getting in front of and behind each other. This produces the effect whereby chunks appear to be missing. The effect is particularly noticeable in water orbs. Orbs may be close, like this, if a single object produces multiple highlights.

Fluffy orbs

It's possible to get orbs with fluffy edges (a sort of halo effect) rather than usual sharp curves (see pic below).

Fluffy orb (with halo effect)

This effect happens when the object causing the orb is highly reflective. The halo is caused by too much light being reflected back to camera from the flash. The 'halo' is an overexposed area while the background is underexposed. This is an exaggerated example. A typical 'natural' fluffy orb would be smaller. The camera overexposes the orb because it only forms a small part of the overall photo frame (which it uses to decide how long to keep the flash going). Note the faint coloured lines in the top orb. These are Moire Patterns (see 'Coloured Orbs', left)

Truncated orbs

As explained in 'oddly shaped orbs' (left), orbs are typically truncated in the corners of photos. Here is a photo of of the effect.

Truncated orbs at the edge of a frame
Truncated orbs in the corner of a photo. In the diagram, left, light from the orb, B, arrives at a steeper angle because it is so close to the lens. As a result some of it is lost when it hits the edge of the lens and it never reaches the CCD. The object A, which is further away and in focus, loses no light and is shown accurately.

Truncation (or optical vignetting) is circular because the barrel of the lens is circular. Truncation occurs mostly in the corners of photographs, and sometimes the edges, because the light is being projected by a circular lens onto a rectangular CCD. It may not occur in all cameras - it depends on the design. The truncation is called the 'cat's eye effect' by photographers.
© Maurice Townsend 2008