ASSAP logo Photo manipulation and how close orbs are
Home
Research
Investigations

Members area

News

Join
Glossary
Articles
Media
Contact us

Digitally manipulated photo
Digitally manipulated photo

Note that ALL other photographs in this Anomalous Photo section have NOT been digitally processed (apart from compression).

The photo above shows a wood taken from a hill above (not haunted as far as I know!). However, all is not as it seems! The 'foreground', consisting of rocks and a tree stump, came from two completely different photographs. At this tiny size the manipulation may not be noticed by a casual observer. However, it is a deliberately crude montage designed to illustrate what to look out for if you suspect digital manipulation.

The 'foreground' looks nicely sharp. However, further back, half way into the background it looks sharp again. Since one photo can only have one place where sharpness is at its best, this implies two photos stuck together.

Also, the tree stump looks sharper and brighter than the the rest of the 'foreground', even though it is supposed to be at the same distance from the camera.

Tellingly, the 'foregound' looks to have been photographed horizontally. But the trees behind appear to have been snapped diagonally from above. Also, the edges of the 'foreground' look strangely sharp, like a picture cut from a magazine.

Anomalous photo pages...
Orb FAQ - start here for orbs
What are anomalous photos?
Orbs and light trails
Vortexes and mists
Reflections, simulacra, shadows
Manipulation and more orbs
Taking anomalous photos
Odd shaped and coloured orbs
Orbs behind objects and zone
Take great orb photos
Orbs that aren't dust
Orbs: alternative explanations
Orbs with tails
Ghosts and extras in photos
Flare and weird glowing shapes
A weird photo and mirages

EXIF information

Digital cameras record all sorts of useful data about each exposure in the actual picture file itself. This can be seen on with EXIF readers (or, on Windows XP, in the properties tab). The information includes when the picture was taken and (if applicable) last modified! Note, however, that there is software to modify EXIF information.

   

Orbs are very close

Orb against in-focus background
Orb against in-focus background

If you look at the 'orb' in the picture above, it appears fairly sharp with well-defined edges and uniform white colouration.

Orb against out of focus background Orb against out of focus background

In the next picture, an 'orb' appears in front of the same background. This time the background is too close to be in focus*. However, the orb still appears sharply defined and uniformly coloured. This is despite the fact that it must be far too close to be in focus. That is because it is, in fact, a circle of confusion which represents a single point light-source hopelessly out of focus.

The 'orb' must be out of focus because everything in the field of view, even the subject itself, is too close to the camera lens to be in focus. This shows that such orbs are not 'out there and in focus' but instead are extremely close to the lens and very much out of focus.

* This is known to be the case here because both pictures were taken deliberately (like most photos here) to demonstrate the point

© Maurice Townsend 2007

Site map
About us ASSAP News

Anomaly

Groups

Library
Blog
Links